Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes. 2009;2:9-15
Published online before print January 13, 2009, doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.108.813741
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2/1/9    most recent
CIRCOUTCOMES.108.813741v1
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Concannon, T. W.
Right arrow Articles by Selker, H. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Concannon, T. W.
Right arrow Articles by Selker, H. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Acute coronary syndromes
Right arrow CPR and emergency cardiac care
Right arrow Health policy and outcome research
Right arrowRelated Articles

Original Articles

Elapsed Time in Emergency Medical Services for Patients With Cardiac Complaints

Are Some Patients at Greater Risk for Delay?

Thomas W. Concannon, PhD; John L. Griffith, PhD; David M. Kent, MD, MS; Sharon-Lise Normand, PhD; Joseph P. Newhouse, PhD; James Atkins, MD; Joni R. Beshansky, RN, MPH and Harry P. Selker, MD, MSPH

From the Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies (T.W.C., J.L.G., D.M.K., J.R.B., H.P.S.), Tufts Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass; Department of Health Care Policy (S.-L.N., J.P.N.), Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass; Harvard School of Public Health (S-L.N., J.P.N.), Boston, Mass; Kennedy School of Government (J.P.N.), Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass; Faculty of Arts and Sciences (J.P.N.), Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass; and University of Texas Southwestern Medical School (J.A.), Dallas, Tex.

Correspondence to Thomas W. Concannon, PhD, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington Street #063, Boston, MA 02111. E-mail tconcannon{at}tuftsmedicalcenter.org

Received August 12, 2008; accepted November 14, 2008.

Background— In patients with a major cardiac event, the first priority is to minimize time to treatment. For many patients, first contact with the health system is through emergency medical services (EMS). We set out to identify patient-level and neighborhood-level factors that were associated with elapsed time in EMS.

Methods and Results— A retrospective cohort study was conducted in 10 municipalities in Dallas County, Tex, from January 1 through December 31, 2004. The data set included 5887 patients with suspected cardiac-related symptoms. The region was served by 29 hospitals and 98 EMS depots. Multivariate models included measures of distance traveled, time of day, day of week, and patient and neighborhood characteristics. The main outcomes were elapsed time in EMS (continuous; in minutes) and delay in EMS (dichotomous; >15 minutes beyond median elapsed time). We found positive associations between patient characteristics and both average elapsed time and delay in EMS care. Variation in average elapsed time was not large enough to be clinically meaningful. However, approximately 11% (n=647) of patients were delayed ≥15 minutes. Women were more likely to be delayed (adjusted odds ratio, 1.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.32 to 1.74), and this association did not change after adjusting for other characteristics, including neighborhood socioeconomic composition.

Conclusions— Compared with otherwise similar men, women have 50% greater odds of being delayed in the EMS setting. The determinants of delay should be a special focus of EMS studies in which time to treatment is a priority.

Key Words: heart diseases • population • patients • women


 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE

Guest editor for this article was Eric D. Peterson, MD.


Related Articles

Gender Delay in Emergency Medical Services: Does it Really Exist?
Joseph P. Ornato
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2009 2: 4-5. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Elapsed Time in Emergency Medical Services for Patients With Cardiac Complaints: Are Some Patients at Greater Risk for Delay?
Thomas W. Concannon, John L. Griffith, David M. Kent, Sharon-Lise Normand, Joseph P. Newhouse, James Atkins, Joni R. Beshansky, and Harry P. Selker
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2009 2: 9-15. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc Qual OutcomesHome page
H. M. Krumholz
One Year at Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, September 1, 2009; 2(5): 399 - 401.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc Qual OutcomesHome page
H. M. Krumholz
Medicine in the Era of Outcomes Measurement
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, May 1, 2009; 2(3): 141 - 143.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc Qual OutcomesHome page
H. M. Krumholz
Outcomes Research: Myths and Realities
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, January 1, 2009; 2(1): 1 - 3.
[Full Text] [PDF]