Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes. 2009;2:170-177
Published online before print May 5, 2009, doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.108.823765
Free Article
This Article
Free upon publication Free Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2/3/170    most recent
CIRCOUTCOMES.108.823765v1
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rinfret, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rinfret, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Compliance/Adherence
Right arrow Primary prevention
Right arrow Clinical Studies

Original Articles

The Impact of a Multidisciplinary Information Technology–Supported Program on Blood Pressure Control in Primary Care

Stéphane Rinfret, MD, MSc; Marie-Thérèse Lussier, MD, MSc; Anthony Peirce, MSc; Fabie Duhamel, PhD; Sylvie Cossette, PhD; Lyne Lalonde, PhD; Chantal Tremblay, RN; Marie-Claude Guertin, PhD; Jacques LeLorier, MD, PhD; Jacques Turgeon, PhD; Pavel Hamet, MD, PhD for the LOYAL Study Investigators

From the Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (S.R., A.P., C.T., J.L., J.T., P.H.), University of Montreal; the Department of Medicine (S.R., J.L., P.H.), Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, University of Montreal; the Primary Care Research Team (M.-T.L., F.D.), Cité de la Santé de Laval; the Department of Family Medicine (M.-T.L.), Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal; the Faculty of Nursing (F.D., S.C.), University of Montreal; the Montreal Heart Institute Research Center (S.C.); the Faculty of Pharmacy (L.L., J.T.), University of Montreal; and the Montreal Heart Institute Coordination Center (M.-C.G.), Quebec, Canada.

Correspondence to Pavel Hamet, MD, PhD, Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal - Technopôle Angus, 2901 rue Rachel Est, bureau 401-1, Montréal, QC, H1W 4A4. E-mail pavel.hamet{at}umontreal.ca

Received July 29, 2008; accepted January 27, 2009.

Background— Hypertension is a leading mortality risk factor yet inadequately controlled in most affected subjects. Effective programs to address this problem are lacking. We hypothesized that an information technology–supported management program could help improve blood pressure (BP) control.

Methods and Results— This randomized controlled trial included 223 primary care hypertensive subjects with mean 24-hour BP >130/80 and daytime BP >135/85 mm Hg measured with ambulatory monitoring (ABPM). Intervention subjects received a BP monitor and access to an information technology–supported adherence and BP monitoring system providing nurses, pharmacists, and physicians with monthly reports. Control subjects received usual care. The mean (±SD) follow-up was 348 (±78) and 349 (±84) days in the intervention and control group, respectively. The primary end point of the change in the mean 24-hour ambulatory BP was consistently greater in intervention subjects for both systolic (–11.9 versus –7.1 mm Hg; P<0.001) and diastolic BP (–6.6 versus –4.5 mm Hg; P=0.007). The proportion of subjects that achieved Canadian Guideline target BP (46.0% versus 28.6%) was also greater in the intervention group (P=0.006). We observed similar BP declines for ABPM and self-recorded home BP suggesting the latter could be an alternative for confirming BP control. The intervention was associated with more physician-driven antihypertensive dose adjustments or changes in agents (P=0.03), more antihypertensive classes at study end (P=0.007), and a trend toward improved adherence measured by prescription refills (P=0.07).

Conclusions— This multidisciplinary information technology–supported program that provided feedback to patients and healthcare providers significantly improved blood pressure levels in a primary care setting.

Key Words: hypertension • blood pressure • blood pressure monitoring, ambulatory




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc Qual OutcomesHome page
H. M. Krumholz
One Year at Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, September 1, 2009; 2(5): 399 - 401.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc Qual OutcomesHome page
H. M. Krumholz
Medicine in the Era of Outcomes Measurement
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, May 1, 2009; 2(3): 141 - 143.
[Full Text] [PDF]