Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes. 2009;2:540-547
Published online before print September 22, 2009, doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.108.844399
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2/6/540    most recent
CIRCOUTCOMES.108.844399v1
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ferreira-González, I.
Right arrow Articles by Permanyer-Miralda, G.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ferreira-González, I.
Right arrow Articles by Permanyer-Miralda, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Acute coronary syndromes
Right arrow Acute myocardial infarction

Original Articles

Patient Registries of Acute Coronary Syndrome

Assessing or Biasing the Clinical Real World Data?

Ignacio Ferreira-González, MD, PhD; Josep R. Marsal, BSc; Francesca Mitjavila, MD; Antoni Parada, BSc; Aida Ribera, BSc, PhD; Purificación Cascant, RN; Núria Soriano, MD; Pedro L. Sánchez, MD, PhD; Fernando Arós, MD, PhD; Magda Heras, PhD, MD; Héctor Bueno, PhD, MD; Jaume Marrugat, MD, PhD; José Cuñat, MD, PhD; Emilia Civeira, MD, PhD and Gaietà Permanyer-Miralda, MD, PhD

From the Vall d’Hebron Hospital (I.F.-G., J.R.M., A.R., P.C., N.S., G.P.-M.), Barcelona; CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP) (I.F.-G., J.R.M., F.M., A.R., P.C., N.S., G.P.-M.); Agència d’Avaluació de Tecnologia i Recerca Mèdiques (A.P.), Barcelona; Hospital General Universitario "Gregorio Marañón" (P.L.S., H.B.), Madrid; Hospital Txagorritxu (F.A.), Vitoria; Hospital Clinic (M.H.), Barcelona, IDIBAPS; Institut Municipal d’Investigació Mèdica (IMIM. Hospital del Mar) (J.M.), Barcelona; Hospital La Fe (J.C.), Valencia; and Hospital Clínico (E.C.), Zaragoza, Spain.

Correspondence to Ignacio Ferreira-González. Epidemiology Unit, Cardiology Department, Vall d’Hebron Hospital, Passeig Vall d’Hebron 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain. E-mail nacho_ferreira{at}hotmail.com

Received December 15, 2008; accepted August 7, 2009.

Background— The risk of selection bias in registries and its consequences are relatively unexplored. We sought to assess selection bias in a recent registry about acute coronary syndrome and to explore the way of conducting and reporting patient registries of acute coronary syndrome.

Methods and Results— We analyzed data from patients of a national acute coronary syndrome registry undergoing an audit about the comprehensiveness of the recruitment/inclusion. Patients initially included by hospital investigators (n=3265) were compared to eligible nonincluded (missed) patients (n=1439). We assessed, for 25 exposure variables, the deviation of the in-hospital mortality relative risks calculated in the initial sample from the actual relative risks. Missed patients were of higher risk and received less recommended therapies than the included patients. In-hospital mortality was almost 3 times higher in the missed population (9.34% [95% CI, 7.84 to 10.85] versus 3.9% [95% CI, 2.89 to 4.92]). Initial relative risks diverged from the actual relative risks more than expected by chance (P<0.05) in 21 variables, being higher than 10% in 17 variables. This deviation persisted on a smaller degree on multivariable analysis. Additionally, we reviewed a sample of 129 patient registries focused on acute coronary syndrome published in thirteen journals, collecting information on good registry performance items. Only in 38 (29.4%) and 48 (37.2%) registries was any audit of recruitment/inclusion and data abstraction, respectively, mentioned. Only 4 (3.1%) authors acknowledged potential selection bias because of incomplete recruitment.

Conclusions— Irregular inclusion can introduce substantial systematic bias in registries. This problem has not been explicitly addressed in a substantial number of them.

Key Words: acute coronary syndrome • selection bias

The online-only Data Supplement is available at http://circoutcomes.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/full/CIRCOUTCOMES.108.844399/DC1.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc Qual OutcomesHome page
H. M. Krumholz
Registries and Selection Bias: The Need for Accountability
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, November 1, 2009; 2(6): 517 - 518.
[Full Text] [PDF]