Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes. 2008;1:4-6
doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.108.814244
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kirtane, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kirtane, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, D. J.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Editorials

When Is Better Not Good Enough?

Insights From the COURAGE Economic Study

Ajay J. Kirtane, MD, SM and David J. Cohen, MD, MSc

From Columbia University Medical Center/New York Presbyterian Hospital and the Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY (A.J.K.); Saint Luke’s Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Mo (D.J.C.).

Correspondence to David J. Cohen, MD, MSc, Saint Luke’s Mid America Heart Institute, 4401 Wornall Road, Kansas City, MO 64111. E-mail dcohen@saint-lukes.org

Key Words: Editorials • cost–benefit analysis • epidemiology • angioplasty • transluminal • percutaneous


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 

More than 800 000 percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures are performed annually in the United States alone at a cost of more than $10 billion. Although many of these procedures are performed on patients with symptoms such as acute myocardial infarction and unstable angina, for whom randomized clinical trials have demonstrated substantial benefits including prevention of myocardial infarction and reduced mortality rate,1,2 approximately half of all PCI procedures are performed on patients with stable coronary artery disease. In this setting, PCI has been shown to improve anginal symptoms and quality of life; however, it has not significantly affected clinical outcomes such as death and nonfatal myocardial infarction in prior randomized trials.3,4 Given the substantial economic burden of these procedures and the modest clinical benefits to patients with stable coronary artery disease, it is therefore not surprising that PCI—and particularly, elective PCI for stable patients—is a prime target for economic evaluation.

Article see p 12

As such, the article by Weintraub et al5 in this issue of Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, which describes the results of a prospective in-trial and lifetime cost–utility analysis performed alongside the COURAGE (Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive druG Evaluations) trial, is a welcome addition to the cardiovascular literature. COURAGE was a randomized clinical trial that compared PCI with optimal medical therapy (PCI+OMT) versus OMT alone as initial management strategies for patients with stable coronary artery disease. As previously described, at a median follow-up of 4.6 years, there were no significant differences between the . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Related Article

Cost-Effectiveness of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Optimally Treated Stable Coronary Patients
William S. Weintraub, William E. Boden, Zugui Zhang, Paul Kolm, Zefeng Zhang, John A. Spertus, Pamela Hartigan, Emir Veledar, Claudine Jurkovitz, Jim Bowen, David J. Maron, Robert O'Rourke, Marcin Dada, Koon K. Teo, Ron Goeree, Paul G. Barnett on Behalf of the Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program No. 424 (COURAGE Trial) Investigators and Study Coordinators
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2008 1: 12-20. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol IntvHome page
L. W. Klein, F. H. Edwards, E. R. DeLong, L. Ritzenthaler, G. D. Dangas, and W. S. Weintraub
ASCERT: The American College of Cardiology Foundation-The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Collaboration on the Comparative Effectiveness of Revascularization Strategies
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., January 1, 2010; 3(1): 124 - 126.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc Qual OutcomesHome page
H. M. Krumholz
One Year at Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, September 1, 2009; 2(5): 399 - 401.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc Qual OutcomesHome page
G. A. Diamond and S. Kaul
Evidence-Based Financial Incentives for Healthcare Reform: Putting It Together
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, March 1, 2009; 2(2): 134 - 140.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc Qual OutcomesHome page
H. M. Krumholz
Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes: Scholarship to Improve Health and Health Care for Patients and Populations
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, September 1, 2008; 1(1): 1 - 3.
[Full Text] [PDF]