Editorials |
From the Division of Rheumatology, Immunology, and Allergy, Brigham and Womens Hospital, Boston, Mass.
Correspondence to Daniel H. Solomon, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology, and Allergy, Brigham and Womens Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115. E-mail dsolomon@partners.org
Key Words: Editorials
An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract. |
Painful musculoskeletal conditions commonly coexist with cardiovascular disease. Older persons with elevated body mass index are at risk of degenerative arthritis, and low back pain as well as cardiovascular disease. Inflammatory arthritis, including rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, and psoriatic arthritis, are associated with an elevated risk of cardiovascular events. The overlapping epidemiology of arthritis and cardiovascular disease ensures that analgesics will always be widely prescribed to patients at risk for future cardiac events. Thus, even though the selective and some nonselective nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are known to be associated with cardiac events, they are widely used even in patients with known cardiovascular disease.
Article see p 155
Several randomized controlled trials comparing COX-2 selective NSAIDs (eg, celecoxib, rofecoxib, and valdeoxib) with nonselective agents or placebo found an elevated risk of cardiac events with the selective agents.1–3 The cardiac risk observed with the COX-2 selective agents appears to differ by agent and by dosage. However, a number of nonselective NSAIDs also may be associated with cardiovascular risk, such as diclofenac.4 Information about nonselective NSAID risk has primarily been derived from observational data, as few randomized controlled trials of adequate duration have examined cardiovascular risk with these agents. What can be learned from observational data regarding the cardiovascular risk of NSAIDs?
Although randomized controlled trials serve as the standard for judging a drugs efficacy, there are many reasons why trials may not be as useful for assessing toxicity. First, efficacy for arthritis is typically judged at 12 weeks of follow-up and does
Related Article
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2009 2: 155-163.
|
Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | Circulation Journals Home | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2009 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |