Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes. 2009;2:404-406
doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.901249
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roger, V. L.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Roger, V. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Epidemiology
Right arrow Other Treatment
Right arrow Resource utilization
Right arrowRelated Articles

Editorials

Cardiovascular Disease Surveillance in the Comparative Effectiveness Landscape

Véronique L. Roger, MD, MPH

From the Department of Health Sciences Research and Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minn.

Correspondence to Véronique L. Roger, MD, MPH, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905. E-mail roger.veronique@mayo.edu


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 

As the leading cause of death in the Western world, cardiovascular disease (CVD) constitutes an enormous public health problem.1 The last 4 decades have been characterized chiefly by the postponement of CVD events and CVD related deaths until older age. Thus, the burden of CVD is increasing in parallel with the increase in life expectancy.2 Within this context, identifying persons with CVD, measuring its incidence and outcome and how these vary over time and across populations is essential. A central goal of this monitoring (otherwise termed surveillance) has been to understand the determinants of the trends in CVD and in particular the respective responsibility of primary prevention versus that of the care of established disease in the genesis of the CVD trends. A direct extension of surveillance is its application to assess the effectiveness of care and the response to interventions designed to improve the quality of care.

Articles see pp 414, 475, and 508

Over the first year of its existence, the journal Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes published 3 important articles that illustrate the clinical relevance of surveillance and the applicability of trend studies to care improvement.

The article by Lewsey et al constitutes a classic example of CVD surveillance.3 The authors present much needed data on recent (1986 to 2005) trends in the epidemiology of stroke indicating that age- and sex-specific incidence rates of fatal and nonfatal hospitalized strokes in Scotland declined in men from 235 (95% CI, 229 to 242) to 149 (144 to 154) . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Related Articles

Sustaining Improvement in Door-to-Balloon Time Over 4 Years: The Mayo Clinic ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Protocol
David M. Nestler, Amit Noheria, Luis H. Haro, Latha G. Stead, Wyatt W. Decker, Lori N. Scanlan-Hanson, Ryan J. Lennon, Choon-Chern Lim, David R. Holmes, Jr, Charanjit S. Rihal, Malcolm R. Bell, and Henry H. Ting
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2009 2: 508-513. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Age- and Sex-Specific Trends in Fatal Incidence and Hospitalized Incidence of Stroke in Scotland, 1986 to 2005
James D. Lewsey, Pardeep S. Jhund, Michelle Gillies, Jim W.T. Chalmers, Adam Redpath, Laura Kelso, Andrew Briggs, Matthew Walters, Peter Langhorne, Simon Capewell, John J.V. McMurray, and Kate MacIntyre
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2009 2: 475-483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Temporal Changes in the Use of Drug-Eluting Stents for Patients With Non–ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention From 2006 to 2008: Results From the Can Rapid risk stratification of Unstable angina patients Supress ADverse outcomes with Early implementation of the ACC/AHA guidelines (CRUSADE) and Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network–Get With The Guidelines (ACTION–GWTG) Registries
Matthew T. Roe, Anita Y. Chen, Christopher P. Cannon, Sunil Rao, John Rumsfeld, David J. Magid, Ralph Brindis, Lloyd W. Klein, W. Brian Gibler, E. Magnus Ohman, Eric D. Peterson on behalf of the CRUSADE and ACTION–GWTG Registry Participants
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2009 2: 414-420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc Qual OutcomesHome page
H. M. Krumholz
One Year at Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, September 1, 2009; 2(5): 399 - 401.
[Full Text] [PDF]