Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes. 2009;2:338-343
Published online before print April 24, 2009, doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.868505
Free Article
This Article
Free upon publication Free Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2/4/338    most recent
CIRCOUTCOMES.109.868505v1
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoeks, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Poldermans, D.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hoeks, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Poldermans, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Epidemiology
Right arrow Peripheral vascular disease
Right arrow CV surgery: aortic and vascular disease
Right arrow Compliance/Adherence
Right arrow Secondary prevention

Original Articles

Medication Underuse During Long-Term Follow-Up in Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease

Sanne E. Hoeks, MSc; Wilma J.M. Scholte op Reimer, PhD; Yvette R.B.M. van Gestel, MSc; Olaf Schouten, MD; Mattie J. Lenzen, PhD; Willem-Jan Flu, MD; Jan-Peter van Kuijk, MD; Corine Latour, PhD; Jeroen J. Bax, MD; Hero van Urk, MD and Don Poldermans, MD

From the Departments of Anesthesiology (S.E.H., Y.R.B.M.v.G., W.-J.F., J.-P.v.K., D.P.), Vascular Surgery (O.S., H.v.U.), and Cardiology (M.J.L.), Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (W.J.M.S.o.R., C.L.), School of Nursing, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and the Department of Cardiology (J.J.B.), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Correspondence to Don Poldermans, MD, PhD, Erasmus Medical Center, Room H805, ‘s-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail d.poldermans{at}erasmusmc.nl

Received March 29, 2009; accepted April 10, 2009.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Background— Patients with peripheral arterial disease constitute a high-risk population. Guideline-recommended medical therapy use is therefore of utmost importance. The aims of our study were to establish the patterns of guideline-recommended medication use in patients with PAD at the time of vascular surgery and after 3 years of follow up, and to evaluate the effect of these therapies on long-term mortality in this patient group.

Methods and Results— Data on 711 consecutive patients with peripheral arterial disease undergoing vascular surgery were collected from 11 hospitals in the Netherlands (enrollment between May and December 2004). After 3.1±0.1 years of follow-up, information on medication use was obtained by a questionnaire (n=465; 84% response rate among survivors). Guideline-recommended medical therapy use for the combination of aspirin and statins in all patients and β-blockers in patients with ischemic heart disease was 41% in the perioperative period. The use of perioperative evidence-based medication was associated with a reduction of 3-year mortality after adjustment for clinical characteristics (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.94). After 3 years of follow-up, aspirin was used in 74%, statins in 69%, and β-blockers in 54% of the patients respectively. Guideline-recommended medical therapy use for the combination of aspirin, statins, and β-blockers was 50%.

Conclusions— The use of guideline recommended therapies in the perioperative period was associated with reduction in long-term mortality in patients with peripheral arterial disease. However, the proportion of patients receiving these evidence-based treatments—both at baseline and 3 years after vascular surgery—was lower than expected based on the current guidelines. These data highlight a clear opportunity to improve the quality of care in this high-risk group of patients.

Key Words: peripheral arterial disease • surgery • medication • prognosis • guideline adherence


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a common condition, and its prevalence is expected to increase because of the aging population.1 Importantly, only 1 of 9 patients with PAD are symptomatic, but vascular morbidity and mortality is estimated to be similar in patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic PAD.2,3 This poses PAD to be a major health burden. Patients with PAD undergoing vascular surgery are known to be at risk for both early and late cardiovascular events.4,5 Hertzer’s landmark study in 1000 consecutive patients undergoing surgery for PAD who underwent preoperative cardiac catheterizations reported that only 8% had normal coronary arteries, and approximately one third had severe-correctable or severe-inoperable ischemic heart disease (IHD).6 The estimated cardiovascular risk in PAD is as high as in IHD.5,7 Adequate risk reduction management is clearly of utmost importance in these patients.

The international prospective Reduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health (REACH) Registry demonstrated a substantial gap between guideline recommendation and clinical practice throughout the atherothrombotic spectrum.8 In addition, the REACH registry demonstrated that optimal risk factor control was associated with fewer cardiovascular events. Patients with PAD scheduled for surgery are an even higher-risk population. Data are limited in this specific population about the application of risk factor control. Earlier studies have shown that the implementation of guidelines in the perioperative period is rather poor, but data are lacking about medication use in vascular surgery patients at late follow-up.9,10 From observational studies it is known that these patients benefit from long-term medical treatment.11,12 However, the composite effect of perioperative guideline recommended medication in vascular surgery patients long-term outcome, is however, not well established in daily clinical practice.

The aims of our study were to establish the patterns of guideline-recommended medication use in patients with PAD at the time of vascular surgery and after 3 years of follow up, and to evaluate the effect of these therapies on long-term mortality in this patient group.


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Study Population
Between May and December 2004, a survey of clinical practice in vascular surgery patients was conducted in 11 hospitals in the Netherlands.9,13 The total study population consisted of 711 consecutively enrolled patients undergoing peripheral vascular surgery. Five hospitals were located in the central part of the country, 3 were located in the northern region, and 3 were located in the southern region. Two centers were university hospitals, which act as tertiary referral centers. This survey was an integral part of the infrastructure of the survey program supported by the Netherlands Heart Foundation in the context of the Euro Heart Survey Programme. All patients who were admitted to the vascular surgery department of the participating hospitals were screened. Endovascular surgery procedures included aortic endografts or peripheral angioplasties with or without stenting. The open procedures comprised abdominal aortic surgery, carotid endarterectomy, or infrainguinal arterial bypass grafting. All patients provided informed consent before participation. The 11 participating hospitals met the requirements for ethical approval based on local standards. After 3 years, follow-up information on vital status was obtained through the Civil Registries. Patient status could be determined in 701 patients (99%), of whom 149 patients (21%) died during 3-year period. All 552 survivors were contacted to complete questionnaires including medical treatment and the occurrence of cardiovascular events during the 3-year period. Of these, 87 (16%) patients did not respond, leaving 465 (84%) patients for further analysis at 3-year follow-up. The median follow-up time of these patients was 3.1 years (interquartile range, 3.07 to 3.19).

Data Collection
Baseline measurements, patient characteristics, and risk factors were collected by trained research assistants. The hospital charts were searched for information on the relevant clinical characteristics, such as cardiovascular history, diabetes, and renal insufficiency. Furthermore, the following medication use was noted: aspirin, statins, β-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, antithrombotics, calcium-channel blockers, and diuretics. Clinical data including the presence of IHD and cerebrovascular disease (CVD) were updated at 3 years after surgery. Polyvascular disease was defined as coexistent arterial disease in 1 or 2 other territories (coronary or cerebral) within each patient with PAD. Ischemic heart disease was defined as history of myocardial infarction, angina, or previous coronary revascularization. Cerebrovascular disease (CVD) was defined as a previous ischemic cerebrovascular accident.

Guideline-Recommended Medical Therapy Use
All patients with PAD were considered candidates for aspirin and statins in this study. β-blockers were indicated in patients with known IHD. These indications are based on national and international guidelines for patients with PAD.14–17 Guideline-recommended medical therapy for the combination of aspirin, statins, and β-blockers was considered to be present when (1) aspirin, statins, as well as β-blockers were used in patients with IHD, or (2) aspirin and statins were used in patients without IHD, irrespective of β-blockers. The extent of guideline recommended medical treatment was quantified by the absolute number of used drugs, ie, 0 to 1, 2, or all 3 drugs per individual patient (aspirin, statins, β-blockers).

Outcome
The main outcome measure of this study was all-cause mortality within 3 years after vascular surgery.

Statistical Analyses
Clinical characteristics are described as numbers and percentages for dichotomous variables, and the continuous variable age was reported as mean with standard deviation. Comparisons between categorical variables were performed using Pearson {chi}2 tests. Trend tests were used to calculate the probability value for trend across the number of vascular beds. The relation between guideline-recommended medical therapy use in the perioperative period and 3-year mortality was evaluated by multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis with adjustment for confounders. All potential confounders (age, gender, IHD, heart failure, CVD, diabetes, renal insufficiency, and type of surgery) were entered in the multivariable model to ensure giving an as unbiased as possible estimate for the relation between medical therapy use and long-term mortality. Sensitivity analyses were performed using a hierarchical model with hospital as random effect. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were calculated to assess the relation between the extent of guideline compliant medical treatment and long-term survival and compared with a log-rank test. For all tests, a probability value <0.05 (2-sided) was considered significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 15.0 statistical software.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Of the 711 included patients, 149 (21%) died during the 3-year follow up period. Baseline characteristics are presented in Table 1. Half of patients underwent an endovascular procedure (n=354), 328 patients (46%) had open surgery, and 29 patients (4%) underwent carotid endarterectomy. Three-year mortality rates increased from 18% in PAD only to 28% in patients with 3 affected vascular beds (trend P=0.014). Nonresponder data analysis showed that responders did not differ significantly from nonresponders with regard to age, sex, and other cardiovascular risk factors.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Baseline Characteristics
 
Baseline Medication
Of the initial 711 patients, 28% had IHD and 17% had CVD at baseline. Polyvascular disease was present in 41%. Aspirin was used in 534 patients (75%), 398 (56%) used statins, and 340 (48%) used β-blockers in the perioperative period (Table 2). β-blocker use in patients with IHD (n=201) was 69%. Overall, guideline-recommended medical therapy use for the combination of aspirin and statins in all patients and β-blockers in patients with IHD was 41%. Patients with guideline-recommended medical therapy use were younger (66 versus 68 years, P=0.019) and more often had a history of CVD (21% versus 15%, P=0.040) and polyvascular disease (46% versus 37%, P=0.014) compared to patients without this treatment (Table 3). Three-year mortality in patients with or without guideline compliant medical treatment was 15% and 26%, respectively (P<0.001). The use of evidence-based medication was associated with a significant reduction in long-term mortality after adjustment for clinical characteristics (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.94). Sensitivity analyses using a hierarchical model with hospital as random effect revealed comparable results. Furthermore, there was a clear relationship between the increasing number of guideline-recommended therapies and long-term mortality (Figure 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Medical Treatment at Baseline and at 3-Year Follow-Up
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Patient Characteristics Stratified by the Use of Guideline Recommended Perioperative Medication Use
 

Figure 1868505
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1. Survival according to the number of evidence-based medications (ie, aspirin, statins, and β-blockers).

 
Follow-Up Medication Use
Of the 465 patients at 3-year follow-up, mean age was 68 years with 70% male. A history of IHD at 3-year follow-up was present in 163 patients (35%) and CVD in 82 (18%). In total, 251 (54%) patients had "PAD only," 183 (39%) had PAD in combination with 1 other affected vascular bed (IHD or CVD), and 31 (7%) had 3 affected vascular beds. The percentage of medication use at long-term follow-up was still low (Table 2). Aspirin was used in 74% of patients, statins in 69%, and β-blockers in 54% of patients after 3 years. In patients with PAD only, statin use increased from 48% to 65% in the 3-year period. This increase was also observed in CVD patients. Guideline-recommended medical therapy use for the combination of aspirin and statins in all patients and β-blockers in patients with IHD was only 50%. A clear relationship between medication use and number of vascular beds was observed (Figure 2). Patients with PAD only were treated less intensively with statins (trend P=0.016) and β-blockers (trend P<0.001), compared to patients with more affected vascular beds.


Figure 2868505
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2. Medication use at 3 years of follow-up according to the number of affected vascular beds.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Perioperative and long-term use of guideline-recommended medications in vascular surgery patients proved to be lower than expected based on the current guidelines. However, we noted a clear relationship between greater evidence-based medication use and increasing number of affected vascular beds. Importantly, we also observed a significantly lower 3-year mortality in patients who where treated according to the guidelines. These data clearly indicate the need for both initiating optimal medical treatment during perioperative assessment and improving the rates of long-term evidence-based medication use.

Risk factors for atherosclerotic disease are common in patients with PAD. The prognosis of patients with PAD is predominantly determined by the presence and extent of the underlying IHD.5 Consequently, IHD is the most common cause of death in patients with PAD. Thus, atherosclerotic risk factor control and optimal pharmacological treatment are key elements of perioperative and long-term management of patients with PAD. Importantly, our survey demonstrated a graded relationship between greater use of evidence-based therapies in the perioperative period and lower mortality after 3 years of follow-up in consecutive PAD patients seen in daily clinical practice. Our data are in accordance with studies in IHD patients, which also showed significant associations between guideline adherence and better outcomes.18,19 Our findings suggest that adherence to guideline-recommended therapies during hospitalization for vascular surgery might serve as a marker of quality of care.

Adherence to evidence-based guidelines appears to be an important component in improving cardiovascular outcomes in PAD patients. Data from observational studies and registries, however, show that the use of evidence-based medical therapy in the perioperative period remains suboptimal in this high-risk population.10,13,20,21 Our results are in line with previous findings regarding disparities in risk factor management among patients with atherothrombotic disease. McDermott and colleagues previously reported that PAD patients received less intensive drug treatment compared to IHD patients, irrespective of comparable risk.22 Additionally, in a large risk factor–matched population, patients with IHD received more cardiovascular medications, compared with PAD patients.5 The observed poor medical control of PAD patients may explain the worse outcome of PAD patients compared with IHD patients as observed by the study of Welten et al.5,23 The reason for this poor medical control seems to be multifactorial. First, national physician surveys have reported deficiencies in physician knowledge and attitudes regarding the importance of atherosclerotic risk factor reduction in PAD patients.22,24,25 Furthermore, data from the REACH registry demonstrated substantial variation in patients’ medication use by physician specialty.26 For example, statin prescription was 79% among cardiologists and 49% among vascular surgeons, and the same differences were observed for β-blockers (70 versus 34, respectively). In addition, patients themselves are also known to underestimate the cardiovascular risks associated with PAD. A population-based survey showed major knowledge gaps regarding PAD.27 Only 1 of 4 PAD patients were aware of the fact that PAD is associated with increased risk of myocardial infarction and stroke. These data highlight a significant opportunity to improve the use of preventive therapies in these high-risk patients and improve patient compliance.

The discrepancy between daily clinical practice and guideline recommendation demonstrates the need for improving perioperative and long-term care of patients of patients with PAD. In cardiac patients it has been demonstrated that in-hospital initiation of medication has an impressive effect on long-term treatment rates and patients compliance.28 The preoperative visits to the hospital related to the intended vascular procedure in patients with PAD can be considered as an ideal opportunity to initiate medical therapy and lifestyle changes with achievement of treatment targets according to the guidelines. Furthermore, long-term care should be provided by all involved cardiovascular principles. Increased efforts should be focused on implementing guideline recommendations in both the perioperative and long-term period. This can potentially be achieved by implementing disease management programs including critical pathways, patient education, and multidisciplinary hospital teams.29 Programs such as American College of Cardiology Guidelines Applied in Practice (GAP) and the American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines (GWTG) program are examples of successful quality improvement programs that are designed to improve guideline adherence through tools and system redesign strategies. The GAP project resulted in increased adherence to key treatments in the administration of aspirin and β-blockers on admission and the use of aspirin and smoking cessation counseling at discharge.30 The GWTG coronary artery disease program was also associated with improved guideline adherence.31 The use of β-blockers, ACE inhibitors, statins, aspirin, and smoking cessation counseling were significantly increased.32 Our findings highlight the need to implement similar programs in patients with PAD and study their impact on adherence to guideline-recommended therapies and subsequent patient outcomes.

Our study needs to be considered in the context of several potential limitations. First, although adjustments were made for known covariates, there is the possibility of residual confounding by unmeasured factors. Second, we relied on patient report for assessment of long-term medication use. Third, we did not have the data regarding potential contraindications to guideline-recommended therapies. Therefore, we could not determine the rates of medication use among "ideal candidates." Another potential limitation of our work is that the response rate of our study was not 100%. A response rate of 84%, however, is regarded as quite good and importantly, nonresponder analyses revealed no differences between the patients who responded and those who did not.

In conclusion, we showed that perioperative guideline-recommended medical treatment is associated with improved survival in patients with PAD. However, the rates of evidence-based medication use remain low in these high-risk patients—both at baseline and during long-term follow-up. These results highlight an important potential opportunity to improve the quality of care in patients with PAD.


    Acknowledgments
 
Sources of Funding

This work was funded by the Netherlands Heart Foundation, The Hague, The Netherlands (2000T101). S.E.H., Y.R.B.M.v.G., W.-J.F., and J.-P.v.K. are supported by an unrestricted research grant from Lijf & Leven Foundation, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Disclosures

None.


    Footnotes
 
Mikhail Kosiborod, MD, was Guest Editor for this article.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
1. Hirsch AT, Criqui MH, Treat-Jacobson D, Regensteiner JG, Creager MA, Olin JW, Krook SH, Hunninghake DB, Comerota AJ, Walsh ME, McDermott MM, Hiatt WR. Peripheral arterial disease detection, awareness, and treatment in primary care. JAMA. 2001; 286: 1317–1324.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Diehm C, Schuster A, Allenberg JR, Darius H, Haberl R, Lange S, Pittrow D, von Stritzky B, Tepohl G, Trampisch HJ. High prevalence of peripheral arterial disease and co-morbidity in 6880 primary care patients: cross-sectional study. Atherosclerosis. 2004; 172: 95–105.[CrossRef][Medline]

3. Hooi JD, Kester AD, Stoffers HE, Rinkens PE, Knottnerus JA, van Ree JW. Asymptomatic peripheral arterial occlusive disease predicted cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in a 7-year follow-up study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004; 57: 294–300.[CrossRef][Medline]

4. Mangano DT. Perioperative cardiac morbidity. Anesthesiology. 1990; 72: 153–184.[Medline]

5. Welten GM, Schouten O, Hoeks SE, Chonchol M, Vidakovic R, van Domburg RT, Bax JJ, van Sambeek MR, Poldermans D. Long-term prognosis of patients with peripheral arterial disease: a comparison in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 51: 1588–1596.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Hertzer NR, Beven EG, Young JR, O'Hara PJ, Ruschhaupt WF, III, Graor RA, Dewolfe VG, Maljovec LC. Coronary artery disease in peripheral vascular patients. A classification of 1000 coronary angiograms and results of surgical management. Ann Surg. 1984; 199: 223–233.[Medline]

7. Steg PG, Bhatt DL, Wilson PW, D'Agostino R Sr, Ohman EM, Rother J, Liau CS, Hirsch AT, Mas JL, Ikeda Y, Pencina MJ, Goto S. One-year cardiovascular event rates in outpatients with atherothrombosis. JAMA. 2007; 297: 1197–1206.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Cacoub PP, Abola MT, Baumgartner I, Bhatt DL, Creager MA, Liau CS, Goto S, Rother J, Steg PG, Hirsch AT. Cardiovascular risk factor control and outcomes in peripheral artery disease patients in the Reduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health (REACH) Registry. Atherosclerosis. In press.

9. Hoeks SE, Scholte op Reimer WJ, Lenzen MJ, van Urk H, Jorning PJ, Boersma E, Simoons ML, Bax JJ, Poldermans D. Guidelines for cardiac management in noncardiac surgery are poorly implemented in clinical practice: results from a peripheral vascular survey in the Netherlands. Anesthesiology. 2007; 107: 537–544.[CrossRef][Medline]

10. Hoeks SE, Scholte Op Reimer WJ, van Urk H, Jorning PJ, Boersma E, Simoons ML, Bax JJ, Poldermans D. Increase of 1-year mortality after perioperative beta-blocker withdrawal in endovascular and vascular surgery patients. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007; 33: 13–19.[CrossRef][Medline]

11. Kertai MD, Boersma E, Bax JJ, Thomson IR, Cramer MJ, van de Ven LL, Scheffer MG, Trocino G, Vigna C, Baars HF, van Urk H, Roelandt JR, Poldermans D. Optimizing long-term cardiac management after major vascular surgery: Role of beta-blocker therapy, clinical characteristics, and dobutamine stress echocardiography to optimize long-term cardiac management after major vascular surgery. Arch Intern Med. 2003; 163: 2230–2235.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Mangano DT, Layug EL, Wallace A, Tateo I. Effect of atenolol on mortality and cardiovascular morbidity after noncardiac surgery. Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group. N Engl J Med. 1996; 335: 1713–1720.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Hoeks SE. Statin use in the elderly; results from a peripheral vascular survey in the Netherlands. J Vasc Surg. 2008; 8: 891–895;discussion 895–896.

14. Boomsma LJ, Bartelink ML, Stoffers HE, Wiersma T, Assendelft WJ. [Summary of the practice guideline ‘Peripheral vascular disease’ (first revision) from the Dutch College of General Practitioners]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2004; 148: 1490–1494.[Medline]

15. Hirsch AT, Haskal ZJ, Hertzer NR, Bakal CW, Creager MA, Halperin JL, Hiratzka LF, Murphy WR, Olin JW, Puschett JB, Rosenfield KA, Sacks D, Stanley JC, Taylor LM Jr, White CJ, White J, White RA, Antman EM, Smith SC Jr, Adams CD, Anderson JL, Faxon DP, Fuster V, Gibbons RJ, Hunt SA, Jacobs AK, Nishimura R, Ornato JP, Page RL, Riegel B. ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease (lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic): a collaborative report from the American Associations for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology, and the ACC/AHA. Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing committee to develop guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease)–summary of recommendations. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2006; 17: 1383–1397;quiz 1398.

16. Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA, Nehler MR, Harris KA, Fowkes FG. Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II). J Vasc Surg. 2007; 45 Suppl S: S5–67.[CrossRef][Medline]

17. Fleisher LA, Beckman JA, Brown KA, Calkins H, Chaikof E, Fleischmann KE, Freeman WK, Froehlich JB, Kasper EK, Kersten JR, Riegel B, Robb JF. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and care for noncardiac surgery. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery). Circulation. 2007.

18. Fox K, Garcia MA, Ardissino D, Buszman P, Camici PG, Crea F, Daly C, De Backer G, Hjemdahl P, Lopez-Sendon J, Marco J, Morais J, Pepper J, Sechtem U, Simoons M, Thygesen K. Guidelines on the management of stable angina pectoris: executive summary: the Task Force on the Management of Stable Angina Pectoris of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2006; 27: 1341–1381.[Free Full Text]

19. Peterson ED, Roe MT, Mulgund J, DeLong ER, Lytle BL, Brindis RG, Smith SC Jr, Pollack CV Jr, Newby LK, Harrington RA, Gibler WB, Ohman EM. Association between hospital process performance and outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndromes. JAMA. 2006; 295: 1912–1920.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Mukherjee D, Lingam P, Chetcuti S, Grossman PM, Moscucci M, Luciano AE, Eagle KA. Missed opportunities to treat atherosclerosis in patients undergoing peripheral vascular interventions: insights from the University of Michigan Peripheral Vascular Disease Quality Improvement Initiative (PVD-QI2). Circulation. 2002; 106: 1909–1912.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Siddiqui AK, Ahmed S, Delbeau H, Conner D, Mattana J. Lack of physician concordance with guidelines on the perioperative use of {beta}-blockers. Arch Intern Med. 2004; 164: 664–667.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. McDermott MM, Mehta S, Ahn H, Greenland P. Atherosclerotic risk factors are less intensively treated in patients with peripheral arterial disease than in patients with coronary artery disease. J Gen Intern Med. 1997; 12: 209–215.[CrossRef][Medline]

23. McDermott MM, Hahn EA, Greenland P, Cella D, Ockene JK, Brogan D, Pearce WH, Hirsch AT, Hanley K, Odom L, Khan S, Criqui MH, Lipsky MS, Hudgens S. Atherosclerotic risk factor reduction in peripheral arterial diseasea: results of a national physician survey. J Gen Intern Med. 2002; 17: 895–904.[CrossRef][Medline]

24. Al-Omran M. Knowledge and attitude of physicians in a major teaching hospital towards atherosclerotic risk reduction therapy in patients with peripheral arterial disease. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2007; 3: 1019–1027.[Medline]

25. Cassar K, Belch JJ, Brittenden J. Are national cardiac guidelines being applied by vascular surgeons? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2003; 26: 623–628.[CrossRef][Medline]

26. Bhatt DL, Steg PG, Ohman EM, Hirsch AT, Ikeda Y, Mas J-L, Goto S, Liau C-S, Richard AJ, Rother J, Wilson PWF, for the RRI. International prevalence, recognition, and treatment of cardiovascular risk factors in outpatients with atherothrombosis. JAMA. 2006; 295: 180–189.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Hirsch AT, Murphy TP, Lovell MB, Twillman G, Treat-Jacobson D, Harwood EM, Mohler ER III, Creager MA, Hobson RW II, Robertson RM, Howard WJ, Schroeder P, Criqui MH. Gaps in public knowledge of peripheral arterial disease: the first national PAD public awareness survey. Circulation. 2007; 116: 2086–2094.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Spencer FA, Fonarow GC, Frederick PD, Wright RS, Every N, Goldberg RJ, Gore JM, Dong W, Becker RC, French W. Early withdrawal of statin therapy in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: national registry of myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med. 2004; 164: 2162–2168.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Peterson ED, Albert NM, Amin A, Patterson JH, Fonarow GC Implementing critical pathways and a multidisciplinary team approach to cardiovascular disease management. Am J Cardiol. 2008; 102: 47G–56G.[CrossRef][Medline]

30. Mehta RH, Montoye CK, Gallogly M, Baker P, Blount A, Faul J, Roychoudhury C, Borzak S, Fox S, Franklin M, Freundl M, Kline-Rogers E, LaLonde T, Orza M, Parrish R, Satwicz M, Smith MJ, Sobotka P, Winston S, Riba AA, Eagle KA. Improving quality of care for acute myocardial infarction: The Guidelines Applied in Practice (GAP) Initiative. JAMA. 2002; 287: 1269–1276.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Lewis WR, Peterson ED, Cannon CP, Super DM, LaBresh KA, Quealy K, Liang L, Fonarow GC. An organized approach to improvement in guideline adherence for acute myocardial infarction: results with the Get With The Guidelines quality improvement program. Arch Intern Med. 2008; 168: 1813–1819.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. LaBresh KA, Fonarow GC, Smith SC Jr, Bonow RO, Smaha LC, Tyler PA, Hong Y, Albright D, Ellrodt AG. Improved treatment of hospitalized coronary artery disease patients with the get with the guidelines program. Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2007; 6: 98–105.[Medline]





This Article
Free upon publication Free Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2/4/338    most recent
CIRCOUTCOMES.109.868505v1
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoeks, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Poldermans, D.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hoeks, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Poldermans, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Epidemiology
Right arrow Peripheral vascular disease
Right arrow CV surgery: aortic and vascular disease
Right arrow Compliance/Adherence
Right arrow Secondary prevention