Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes. 2008;1:84-91
Published online before print November 5, 2008, doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.108.796185
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1/2/84    most recent
CIRCOUTCOMES.108.796185v2
CIRCOUTCOMES.108.796185v1
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wan, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Xu, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wan, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Xu, Y.
Related Collections
Right arrow Embolic stroke
Right arrow Anticoagulants
Right arrow Coumarins
Right arrowRelated Articles

Original Articles

Anticoagulation Control and Prediction of Adverse Events in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

A Systematic Review

Yi Wan, MSc; Carl Heneghan, MA, MRCGP; Rafael Perera, DPhil; Nia Roberts, MSc; Jennifer Hollowell, PhD; Paul Glasziou, PhD, FRACGP; Clare Bankhead, DPhil and Yongyong Xu, PhD

From the Department of Health Statistics (Y.W., Y.X.), Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China; Department of Primary Health Care (Y.W., C.H., R.P., N.R., P.G., C.B.) and National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit (J.H.), Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; and Health Care Evaluation Group (J.H.), Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Correspondence to Yi Wan, Department of Primary Health Care, University of Oxford, Rosemary Rue Building, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LF, United Kingdom. E-mail mailwy{at}hotmail.com

Received June 2, 2008; accepted September 9, 2008.

Background— To date, there has been no systematic examination of the relationship between international normalized ratio (INR) control measurements and the prediction of adverse events in patients with atrial fibrillation on oral anticoagulation.

Methods and Results— We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane through January 2008 for studies of atrial fibrillation patients receiving vitamin-K antagonists that reported INR control measures (percentage of time in therapeutic range [TTR] and percentage of INRs in range) and major hemorrhage and thromboembolic events. In total, 47 studies were included from 38 published articles. TTR ranged from 29% to 75%; percentage of INRs ranged from 34% to 84%. From studies reporting both measures, TTR significantly correlated with percentage of INRs in range (P<0.001). Randomized controlled trials had better INR control than retrospective studies (64.9% versus 56.4%; P=0.01). TTR negatively correlated with major hemorrhage (r=–0.59; P=0.002) and thromboembolic rates (r=–0.59; P=0.01). This effect was significant in retrospective studies (major hemorrhage, r=–0.78; P=0.006 and thromboembolic rate, r=–0.88; P=0.03) but not in randomized controlled trials (major hemorrhage, r=0.18; P=0.33 and thromboembolic rate, r=–0.61; P=0.07). For retrospective studies, a 6.9% improvement in the TTR significantly reduced major hemorrhage by 1 event per 100 patient-years of treatment (95% CI, 0.29 to 1.71 events).

Conclusions— In atrial fibrillation patients receiving orally administered anticoagulation treatment, TTR and percentage of INRs in range effectively predict INR control. Data from retrospective studies support the use of TTR to accurately predict reductions in adverse events.

Key Words: anticoagulants • atrial fibrillation • hemorrhage • thrombosis • international normalized ratio


 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE


Related Articles

Anticoagulation Control in Atrial Fibrillation: Optimizing Risks and Benefits
Alawi A. Alsheikh-Ali and N.A. Mark Estes, III
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2008 1: 72-73. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Anticoagulation Control and Prediction of Adverse Events in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review
Yi Wan, Carl Heneghan, Rafael Perera, Nia Roberts, Jennifer Hollowell, Paul Glasziou, Clare Bankhead, and Yongyong Xu
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2008 1: 84-91. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. J. Ellis, M. H. Usman, P. G. Milner, D. M. Canafax, and M. D. Ezekowitz
The First Evaluation of a Novel Vitamin K Antagonist, Tecarfarin (ATI-5923), in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
Circulation, September 22, 2009; 120(12): 1029 - 1035.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc Qual OutcomesHome page
H. M. Krumholz
Outcomes Research: Myths and Realities
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, January 1, 2009; 2(1): 1 - 3.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc Qual OutcomesHome page
A. A. Alsheikh-Ali and N.A. M. Estes III
Anticoagulation Control in Atrial Fibrillation: Optimizing Risks and Benefits
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, November 1, 2008; 1(2): 72 - 73.
[Full Text] [PDF]